首页> 外文OA文献 >The contribution of multi-purpose farming to the food security of small-scale farmers: An agro-economic analysis in the lowland Mekong alluvial plain
【2h】

The contribution of multi-purpose farming to the food security of small-scale farmers: An agro-economic analysis in the lowland Mekong alluvial plain

机译:多功能农业对小农粮食安全的贡献:湄公河冲积平原低地的农业经济分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Agricultural development models are the focus of intense debate in the Cambodianpolicy-making arenas. A model inspired by the ‘Green Revolution’, which promotesindustrialization of rice cropping systems and is mainly dependent on external inputs,is usually contrasted with multi-purpose farming (MPF) in which rice cropping is integratedwith other production to maximize their interactions and complementarities. Thepurpose of this research is to present some economic arguments based on theexperience in promoting MPF of CEDAC (Centre d’Etude et de Dévelopement AgricoleCambodgien, also known as the Cambodian Center for Study and Development inAgriculture).We develop a comparative analysis between conventional rice cropping systemsand MPF to analyze the production economics and the overall patterns of householdlabor diversification. Focusing primarily on rainy-season rice production, we attributesignificant advantage to MPF against non-MPF practices. These differences areperceptible in higher rice yield, lower cash-paid costs, and higher value-addedper hectare. However, these differences become less significant when multi-purposefarming is only partially implemented, i.e. if some elements of the system are missing.MPF provides employment opportunities that represent a reliable alternative to jobmigration. Under MPF, family labor is used more on-farm than is the case with non-MPF farms and is more homogenously distributed throughout the year.However, we identify barriers that curb the scaling-up of this innovation, which includelimited access to information, anticipated lack of labor, lack of capacity or technicalskills, lack of up-front capital to make the initial investment in land conversion to MPF,and land plot sizes that are too small to be converted to this model. We also discussthe opportunities to create markets for products of differentiated quality producedunder multi-purpose farming.
机译:在柬埔寨政策制定领域,农业发展模式是激烈辩论的焦点。受“绿色革命”启发的模型促进了稻米种植系统的工业化,并且主要依靠外部投入,而这种模式通常与多功能种植(MPF)形成对比,后者将稻米种植与其他生产相结合,以最大程度地发挥其相互作用和互补性。这项研究的目的是基于促进CEDAC强积金的经验提出一些经济论点(Centre d'Etude et deDévelopementAgricoleCambodgien,也称为柬埔寨农业研究与发展中心)。我们进行了常规水稻种植之间的比较分析系统和强积金分析生产经济学和家庭劳动力多元化的总体格局。我们主要着眼于雨季水稻生产,我们认为强积金相对于非强积金做法具有明显优势。这些差异可以通过提高水稻产量,降低现金支付成本以及提高每公顷附加值的方式来实现。但是,当仅部分实施多用途农业时,即如果缺少系统的某些要素时,这些差异就变得不那么重要了.MPF提供的就业机会可以替代工作移民。在强积金制度下,与非强积金农场相比,家庭劳动在农场上的使用更多,并且全年分布更为均匀。但是,我们发现了阻碍创新规模扩大的障碍,其中包括有限的信息获取,预期缺乏劳动力,缺乏能力或技术技能,缺乏用于将土地转换为强积金的初始投资的前期资本,以及土地面积太小而无法转换为该模型。我们还将讨论在多功能农业生产中为差异化质量产品创造市场的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号